In a dramatic twist that has left political observers scratching their heads, ODM leader Raila Odinga has reversed his stance on the National Government Constituency Development Fund urging Members of Parliament to focus on their oversight, legislation, and representation roles, and to allow the funds to be directed to counties.
Raila’s recent remarks mark a significant departure from his previous criticisms of MPs’ involvement in the NG-CDF. In the past, he has accused MPs of overstepping their constitutional mandate by controlling funds meant for counties, thereby undermining devolution. He has described such actions as a “power grab” and a “betrayal of the people.”
However, his latest statement suggests a nuanced approach, emphasizing the importance of MPs adhering to their constitutional roles and allowing counties to manage their own resources. This shift raises questions about Raila’s current political strategy and his commitment to devolution.
Raila’s allies, including MPs Kaluma and Junet Mohamed, find themselves in a delicate position. Kaluma has previously criticized MPs for misusing NG-CDF funds, labeling them as “greedy” and accusing them of undermining devolution. Junet Mohamed, a staunch ally of Raila, has also expressed concerns about the misuse of funds and the need for accountability.
With Raila now advocating for a different approach, his allies must navigate the fine line between supporting their leader’s new stance and maintaining their previous positions on the NG-CDF. This internal conflict could have implications for ODM’s unity and its stance on devolution.
President William Ruto has been vocal about his commitment to devolution, emphasizing the importance of transferring functions and resources to counties. He has stated that “devolution is not just a policy; it represents the aspirations of our people and is a transformative pillar of governance.”
However, his administration’s actions regarding the NG-CDF have raised questions about the consistency of this commitment. While advocating for devolution, the government’s involvement in NG-CDF allocations appears to contradict its stated position.
Raila’s recent statements on the NG-CDF present a complex political scenario. On one hand, they could signify a genuine commitment to strengthening devolution by advocating for the proper allocation of funds. On the other hand, they might be seen as a strategic move to align with the government’s position, possibly to gain political leverage.
The true test will be in the actions that follow these statements. Will Raila and his allies push for legislative changes that empower counties and ensure proper oversight of funds? Or will this be another instance of political rhetoric without substantial action?
A turning point for ODM?
Raila’s recent comments on the NG-CDF could mark a turning point for ODM’s approach to devolution. The party’s next steps will be crucial in determining whether this is a genuine shift towards strengthening devolution or merely a political maneuver. As the situation unfolds, all eyes will be on ODM’s actions and whether they align with their leader’s newfound stance on the NG-CDF.
